| Item | Details |
| Location | Kenya, with fieldwork at two to four conservancies and remote collaboration with IIED and KWCA |
| Level of effort | 52 days for two sites, 75 days for three sites or 98 days for four sites |
| Assignment period | October 2026 to November 2027 |
| Application deadline | 5th October 2026 |
The Kenya Wildlife Conservancies Association (KWCA) is seeking a national research consultant to work with International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) to conduct research to identify, substantiate, verify and analyse changes in governance, wellbeing and conservation policy and practice at conservancies that have used the Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity (SAGE) tool.
This assignment forms part of Activity 3.1 of the Scaling up equitable governance in area-based conservation (SEGA) project and may also generate evidence for SEGA Outcome Indicator 0.1. It contributes to a wider outcome-harvesting study across Bolivia, Kenya, Madagascar, Nepal and Tanzania and offers an early-career researcher an opportunity to contribute to applied research and strengthen practical evaluation skills.
Protected and conserved areas are governed by a range of actors, including government agencies, Indigenous Peoples and local communities, non-governmental organisations and private actors. Their conservation effectiveness and social legitimacy depend not only on ecological management, but also on the quality and equity of governance: who participates in decisions, whose rights and knowledge are recognised, how costs and benefits are shared, and whether duty-bearers are accountable.
SAGE is a multistakeholder assessment process that enables actors at a conservation site to assess governance and equity, agree practical actions and monitor progress. Under the Darwin-funded SEGA project, partner organisations and site-level actors are using SAGE to strengthen governance and equity at protected and conserved areas. Several sites are now implementing action plans and reviewing progress, creating an opportunity to examine what has changed since SAGE was applied and how the process may have contributed to those changes.
The study will use outcome harvesting, a participatory evaluation method that starts from evidence of an observed change and works backwards to establish what contributed to it, how significant it is and what can be learned from it.
For this assignment, an outcome is a change in governance, wellbeing or conservation policy or practice. It may be an immediate action or a more transformative change, at any scale, and may be intended or unintended, positive or negative. It may follow from a specific SAGE action or from the SAGE process as a whole. What counts as an outcome, and how significant it is, will be judged with research informants. An outcome lead is a reported but not yet substantiated outcome.
The Kenya study will contribute site-level and national learning while using a common protocol that allows comparison across the five SEGA countries. Findings will inform the ongoing use and refinement of SAGE, support learning among participating sites and partners, and provide evidence for conservation policy and practice.
The overall purpose is to assess SAGE’s contribution to significant changes in governance, wellbeing and conservation policy and practice at selected conservation sites in Kenya, and to generate practical learning for site-level actors, KWCA, IIED and the wider conservation sector.
The specific objectives are to:
The research will cover two to four eligible conservancies in Kenya. Final sites will be selected jointly with IIED and KWCA using agreed criteria, including completion of the SAGE process, implementation or monitoring of action plans, availability of evidence, feasibility of access and the value of diversity across governance and site contexts. The number of sites confirmed during the scoping phase of the researchdetermines the level of effort and the contract value.
Working under KWCA’s coordination and IIED’s technical guidance, the consultant will apply the common outcome-harvesting protocol and tools provided by IIED, adapting their language and facilitation to the Kenyan context while maintaining sufficient consistency for cross-country analysis. The process will be participatory, evidence-based, attentive to power differences and proportionate to the available time and budget.
All deliverables will be produced in English, with accessible summaries or presentations adapted to site-level audiences where appropriate. Templates will be provided for selected outputs.
| No. | Deliverable | Minimum content | Indicative timing |
| 1 | Preparation package | Adapted research plan, including site-selection criteria, stakeholder map, workplan and finalised data-collection and consent tools agreed with IIED and KWCA. | Following online induction and before fieldwork |
| 2 | Scoping and outcome inventory | Desk-review summary and preliminary inventory of outcome leads for each selected site, including proposed evidence sources and substantiators. | After scoping |
| 3 | Site field reports | A concise field report for each site, using the template provided, with fieldwork completed and records organised securely. | After each site visit |
| 4 | Verified outcome database | Completed Excel analysis tool containing outcome statements, evidence, significance, contribution analysis, and cross-outcome links. | After data analysis and substantiation |
| 5 | Draft research report | Draft overall report for all sites in an agreed format, covering methodology, findings, analysis and recommendations. | For review by IIED and KWCA |
| 6 | Validation and sharing products | Presentation and accessible summary for community/site feedback; facilitation of at least one findings-sharing session. | Before finalisation |
| 7 | Final research report | Final report incorporating agreed comments. | End of assignment |
The assignment will require 52 to 98 consultancy days between September 2026 and November 2027, depending on the number of sites selected.
| Phase | Timing | Principal activities | Indicative days |
| Preparation | Oct-Nov 2026 | Online training; review and adaptation of methodology materials; identification of eligible SAGE sites | 4 days |
| Scoping | Nov 2026-Jan 2027 | Review SAGE, planning and prioritisation, progress-monitoring and other reports; review available social and biodiversity data; conduct 2-3 key-informant interviews per eligible site; identify two to four sites for substantiation | 6-12 days |
| Substantiation | Feb-Jun 2027 | Fieldwork at two to four sites, up to 15 days per site, including approximately 12 days based at each site | 30-60 days |
| Analysis and reporting | Jul-Sep 2027 | Organise outcomes; analyse patterns within and across sites; participate in an online cross-country analysis workshop; draft the country-level research report | 10-20 days |
| Dissemination | Sep-Nov 2027 | Share findings at a community or multistakeholder meeting per site and contribute to agreed practitioner or academic outputs | 2 days |
| Total | Sep 2026-Nov 2027 | Total varies according to the final number of sites | 52 days (2 sites); 75 days (3 sites); 98 days (4 sites) |
Applicants should submit a realistic financial proposal showing the day rate and the number of days, with fieldwork costs such as travel, accommodation and subsistence listed separately from professional fees. Payment milestones will be agreed during contracting and linked to satisfactory delivery of agreed outputs.
The assignment is suited to an early-career researcher based in Kenya with a qualitative social-science background and a strong interest in conservation governance and applied evaluation.
Interested individuals are invited to submit both technical and financial proposals. The application package should include:
Applications should be sent to ceo@kwcakenya.com with the subject line ‘Outcome Harvesting Research Consultant – Kenya’ no later than 5th October 2026. Shortlisted applicants may be invited to a virtual interview.